Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Is it too much to hope for the Blood of Heroes Cinematic Universe featuring such luminaries as Anarchy Man and The Baron?Coming soon, the G+ Cinematic Universe...
There was a time when Iron Man was considered a C-list superhero no one would want to see a movie about...
Are you referring to my sitcom The Skarka Chronicles or my major motion picture Anarchy Man: The Movie?So you are suggesting Robert Downey Jr. for the part? He did fine with Tony Stark, but I am still not sure he can manage the level of ego required to pull it off.
[...] All he does is tweet about american politics (another massive shit show, to be sure)
Hey now, there are still good ones.He is a dishonest hack and if he ever comes to GaryCon, GameHole Con, or Nexus, I'm going to tell that to his face.
I'm so tired of the 'indy' gaming clique. I'm sticking with Palladium, Chaosium, and Cubicle 7.
At least when Palladium took my money I got half the product and had the ability to yell at the owner, to his face, and get an apology.
I thought it was agreed they'd remain unnamed.Hey now, there are still good ones.
We'll always have Sine Nomine.
...?I thought it was agreed they'd remain unnamed.
When?There was a time when Iron Man was considered a C-list superhero no one would want to see a movie about...
Good? No he's one of the greatest ones. Not only does he write excellent games but then he delivers ahead of schedule and on while doing so he educates the backsr on how to successfully imitate him. Really I'd buy that guy lunch anytime hesh in Seattle.Hey now, there are still good ones.
We'll always have Sine Nomine.
Kids today don't know their Latin....?
When?
Maybe back when Tom Cruise was being considered for the role.When?
Stercum stercum stercum, morituri sum.Kids today don't know their Latin.
Right up until the point where the movie was a hit. Iron Man was in that category of being popular among comic fans and a complete non-entity to the average movie goer.When?
Right up until the point where the movie was a hit. Iron Man was in that category of being popular among comic fans and a complete non-entity to the average movie goer.
I'm of the opinion that Marvel really lucked out in not having the movie rights to Spider-Man, the X-Men or the Fantastic Four. If they had them, I don't know if they ever would have dared to dig deeper into their catalog. They'd probably have just engaged in a sequel/reboot cycle with their mainstream names. The fact that they made Iron Man into a big success really emboldened them.
"Stercus."Stercum stercum stercum, morituri sum.
(Mea maxima culpa.)
My usual joke is that we all owe the man a handyGood? No he's one of the greatest ones. Not only does he write excellent games but then he delivers ahead of schedule and on while doing so he educates the backsr on how to successfully imitate him. Really I'd buy that guy lunch anytime hesh in Seattle.
Kids today don't know their Latin.
I think the first forty-five minutes of it is easily the best telling of his origin story; they nail who his old personality is in just a few minutes, show how and why he realises he needs to change, and filming so much of the escape sequence from the terrorist PoV really ratchets up the tension and sells how brutal that first IM suit is.Iron Man still might be my favorite Marvel movie after all these years.
Kickstarter have their cut, so they don't give a shit any more.His last contribution was almost a month ago! Even then that was barely fucketh of all.
How does he get away with this? How does kickstarter allow this? Surely after seven fucking years they must realise this is on a hiding to nowhere!
I'm aghast at this!
Even if they were inclined to act, what could they do at this point? Finish Far West for him?Kickstarter have their cut, so they don't give a shit any more.
Pretty much just suspend his account permanently, or until he made restitution of some kind.Even if they were inclined to act, what could they do at this point? Finish Far West for him?
I haven't read their contract but it's a safe bet they've had their lawyers structure things such that they take their cut and provide their services for the project but any liabilities fall on Skarka if he fails to fulfill his end of the bargain. Anything else would be moronic to agree to. I very much doubt they care--if they're even aware of the various unfulfilled projects.Kickstarter have their cut, so they don't give a shit any more.
Sue him for what? They already got paid. You have to have actual damages to sue someone.Pretty much just suspend his account permanently, or until he made restitution of some kind.
They could sue him, but I doubt they'd bother. It's fifty grand.
Enough people reneging on their Kickstarters could damage Kickstarter itself. Also I imagine they'd be able to manage something along the lines of breach of contract.Sue him for what? They already got paid. You have to have actual damages to sue someone.
And the money is most likely already gone, if we're charitable and assume he spent the money working on the project. It would be a waste of everybody's time and money.Pretty much just suspend his account permanently, or until he made restitution of some kind.
They could sue him, but I doubt they'd bother. It's fifty grand.
I think they'd have a very hard time getting a judge to let that go anywhere given they created the business model and contracts, so any hypothetical damages to their name or reputation would likely be deemed a result of their own decision to set it up the way they did. The breach, if any, would likely be between the backers and the project managers, not between Kickstarter and anyone. Anyone can file a lawsuit for anything if they want to pay the fees, but that doesn't mean a judge won't throw it right out as having no basis.Enough people reneging on their Kickstarters could damage Kickstarter itself. Also I imagine they'd be able to manage something along the lines of breach of contract.
There are not a lot of corporations who are going to spend their money to sue someone who owes them nothing on behalf of someone else, just out of the goodness of their hearts. And as I mentioned, even if they tried to it would likely be thrown right out as Kickstarter would have no standing since you can't sue for damages someone else incurred. The backers could try suing Skarka, but as you say the money is probably long gone and even if they got a judgment, good luck getting the judgment satisfied.And the money is most likely already gone, if we're charitable and assume he spent the money working on the project. It would be a waste of everybody's time and money.
Maybe. I'm not a lawyer. that said, neither is Skarka, and the threat is often good enough, even if you don't have a case.I think they'd have a very hard time getting a judge to let that go anywhere given they created the business model and contracts, so any hypothetical damages to their name or reputation would likely be deemed a result of their own decision to set it up the way they did. The breach, if any, would likely be between the backers and the project managers, not between Kickstarter and anyone. Anyone can file a lawsuit for anything if they want to pay the fees, but that doesn't mean a judge won't throw it right out as having no basis.
If anything kills Kickstarter's reputation, it's not going to be some piddly little thing like this, it'll be something big like Coolest Cooler or Juicero or Pebble that the mass market buys into, only to be disappointed.I think they'd have a very hard time getting a judge to let that go anywhere given they created the business model and contracts, so any hypothetical damages to their name or reputation would likely be deemed a result of their own decision to set it up the way they did. The breach, if any, would likely be between the backers and the project managers, not between Kickstarter and anyone. Anyone can file a lawsuit for anything if they want to pay the fees, but that doesn't mean a judge won't throw it right out as having no basis.
Pretty much just suspend his account permanently, or until he made restitution of some kind.
They could sue him, but I doubt they'd bother. It's fifty grand.
Skarka will just add it to the scrapbook of all the other threats to sue him that he has racked up so far.Maybe. I'm not a lawyer. that said, neither is Skarka, and the threat is often good enough, even if you don't have a case.
That's how C&D works after all.
Tuthully they can't do much - but just closing it and banning him might send a message.Pretty much just suspend his account permanently, or until he made restitution of some kind.
They could sue him, but I doubt they'd bother. It's fifty grand.