For me it’s Tunnels & TrollsThat's the first game that comes to mind for me when blackpowder in RPGs comes up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
For me it’s Tunnels & TrollsThat's the first game that comes to mind for me when blackpowder in RPGs comes up.
If you are designing a game and you want people with melee weapons and people with guns to have balanced fights, you've already decided to make an action movie RPG. Don't worry about realism.
I just don't like systems that conflate being a marathon runner, being someone blessed with an amazing immune system, and being a big guy who can lift a ton but has no stamina. Strength and health/constitution being one stat does this unless you then have traits that modify it, and unless they're quite coarse you rapidly end up at the point where having them split to start with would've been simpler.
It's also messy when you move outside the human scale.
So about the only time I'd expect it to not annoy me would be in a game where it's never used and could just be part of the character's 'fluff' description anyway.
That last's logic applies to anything that only clobbers one character. Should all traps be designed so they always catch the whole party? If not, one character gets hit and knocked about and taken out of action and either the whole party waits or that PC and player are out of the action, just as with a disease. You seem to be arguing for a collective group hit point pool or for a game where anything that incapacitates a character is gone after the scene it was applied ends.Right, but is being a marathon runner or having an amazing immune system going to be a big feature of the game? If only one character is good at it, you split the party. If everyone is good at it, it doesn't matter what your stats are. Disease might seem like fun in a hardcore way, but mostly it just brings the adventure to a crawl and takes one character out of action. So you really only want disease as a plot device affecting NPCs.
I just don't like systems that conflate being a marathon runner, being someone blessed with an amazing immune system, and being a big guy who can lift a ton but has no stamina.
That last's logic applies to anything that only clobbers one character. Should all traps be designed so they always catch the whole party? If not, one character gets hit and knocked about and taken out of action and either the whole party waits or that PC and player are out of the action, just as with a disease. You seem to be arguing for a collective group hit point pool or for a game where anything that incapacitates a character is gone after the scene it was applied ends.
(Small pedantic caveat simply because it's interesting: a marathon runner in heavy training - or another type of endurance athlete like an elite cyclist - may actually be more susceptible to disease than a regular person because of the strain of accumulted fatigue on the immune system.)I'm pretty confident that most marathon runners are stronger and vastly healthier than the average person. They might be quicker than a body builder, but will still almost invariably be noticeably stronger than your typical couch potato, and infinitely healthier as well. So I don't get where the huge disconnect is that a marathon runner, or pretty much ANY physically inclined character, would be stronger and healthier than sedentary characters on the basis of having a single stat that gives them all of that in one go.
Should a body builder be stronger than a marathon runner, and the runner quicker? Sure, but that's what skills and advantages (Feats, Edges, whatever) are for. But pretty much every physically inclined character would literally be stronger and healthier than one that isn't physically inclined. That's literally the way it is in real life.
Attributes in RPGs are general abilities. They shouldn't be set around edge cases, but broad strokes of what a character's general aptitudes are like. For everything else there's skills and advantages.
That's sort of how Chivalry & Sorcery did/does things. Depending on edition mass matters more or less (always for encumbrance, sometimes for damage).The other thing of course is whether there's some measure of size in an rpg.
It would be interesting to have Fitness and Size as seperate abilities that when combined in some way yield the measure of Strength.
Likewise 2300AD based strength off a size stat, so they got part-way there.
The first place I remember seeing those was the Top Secret Companion2300AD also had the body shape thing (mesomorph, endomorph, ectomorph) which I thought was a rare addition.
You can obtain this sort of effect without messing with the numbers - for example, if you just have damage take effect at the end of a combat round, rather than after the individual strike, suicide charges then work.This depends on how you implement initiative and the 21 foot rule. Knives are also silent, while it takes a lot of work to make a suppressed pistol hollywood silent. So they don't necessarily need to be balanced against each other in a head on fight, just balanced in a way to make you want a knife expert and a gun expert in the party.
(Small pedantic caveat simply because it's interesting: a marathon runner in heavy training - or another type of endurance athlete like an elite cyclist - may actually be more susceptible to disease than a regular person because of the strain of accumulted fatigue on the immune system.)
I've often thought systems get it wrong by following D&D and making Strength an ability and Athletics the skill.
The A Song of Ice and Fire rpg actually puts it the other way around and I remember thinking it generally makes more sense that way. The ability is basic physical athleticism in a general sense, the skill represents the effort you have put into tuning that to be able to apply force and build muscle.
The other thing of course is whether there's some measure of size in an rpg.
It would be interesting to have Fitness and Size as seperate abilities that when combined in some way yield the measure of Strength.
We're talking size in terms of 'small humans' vs 'large humans', rather than between say 'human', 'halfling', and 'ogre'.IMO, Size should be treated as something separate from Attributes with it's own scale that modifies certain abilities, game stats or rolls based on how small or large something is. It could be treated as Categories (D&D style: Tiny, Medium, Large, Huge, Gargantuan) or levels, if you want to be more granular, and provide consistent modifiers based on whatever measure is used. Larger creatures would get bonuses to Strength, carrying capacity, HP/Equivalent and rolls affected by physical power, but a penalty to rolls involving mobility (including attacks and evasion), while smaller creatures would get the opposite.
But I think that Size is a different thing from actual aptitudes, which is what Attributes (or whatever they're called) tend to reflect in RPGs.
We're talking size in terms of 'small humans' vs 'large humans', rather than between say 'human', 'halfling', and 'ogre'.
I don't find that at all. Now that gaming by video chat is completely normal, as long as you have three hours free in an evening, time I might have spent watching TV or on the Internet, I can spend it gaming. I have three groups at the momentNowadays, you're lucky if you can get a gaming session together once every few months, and you might only have a few hours for that one session. That means you want everyone to get the most of it, otherwise they won't put the effort in to come back for the next session. It was very different when you were playing in high school every day, and having your character taken out for a bit was just an excuse to take a break and read a book while everyone else keeps playing.
I'm pretty confident that most marathon runners are stronger and vastly healthier than the average person. They might be quicker than a body builder, but will still almost invariably be noticeably stronger than your typical couch potato, and infinitely healthier as well. So I don't get where the huge disconnect is that a marathon runner, or pretty much ANY physically inclined character, would be stronger and healthier than sedentary characters on the basis of having a single stat that gives them all of that in one go.
Should a body builder be stronger than a marathon runner, and the runner quicker? Sure, but that's what skills and advantages (Feats, Edges, whatever) are for. But pretty much every physically inclined character would literally be stronger and healthier than one that isn't physically inclined. That's literally the way it is in real life.
Attributes in RPGs are general abilities. They shouldn't be set around edge cases, but broad strokes of what a character's general aptitudes are like. For everything else there's skills and advantages.
You can obtain this sort of effect without messing with the numbers - for example, if you just have damage take effect at the end of a combat round, rather than after the individual strike, suicide charges then work.
I don't find that at all. Now that gaming by video chat is completely normal, as long as you have three hours free in an evening, time I might have spent watching TV or on the Internet, I can spend it gaming. I have three groups at the moment
That's not to say that you shouldn't be cautious about incapacitating a player for an extended time, but it's more an issue in combat-centeres games where you have a team taking on combat threats calibrated for their expected power level. It's less of a problem in a game where you want to avoid combat, like CoC. Having one player in the group slowly withering from a curse is a great way to motivate players.
It's fairly strongly linked to strength in fit, trained people. It's also fairly strongly linked to strength in unfit, untrained people if comparing them to others of the same level of fitness and training.Tracking size of human vs human is too much granularity dealing with things I'm not sure have that huge of an impact realistically speaking. But even then, I think it would be more efficient to track it as its own thing that modifies the core, rather than an "Attribute" (or Characteristic) BRP-style. Cuz Size isn't really an aptitude you can improve over time the way you can Strength or anything else, and conceptually speaking it's this secondary factor that affects you're abilities in other areas rather than being an ability per se. So it shouldn't operate under the same score structure as attributes/innate aptitudes.
I think a lot depends on the type of work you do and the community you surround yourself with. I know people that are in your situation, but it sounds completely foreign to me. Other than a few aberrations, my schedule is exactly the same, and the same is within our group.It also needs to be the same evening for everyone. I've never gone more than 2 months with a consistent work schedule in the past 21 years. I might have a few hours free in the evening one day, but the next week it will be a different day. And the chance that it lines up with everyone else who is playing in that game is next to zero. Especially for more than 2 weeks.
I worked as a waiter for years in a place where restaurant work was very common. I can completely relate to this problem.It also needs to be the same evening for everyone. I've never gone more than 2 months with a consistent work schedule in the past 21 years. I might have a few hours free in the evening one day, but the next week it will be a different day. And the chance that it lines up with everyone else who is playing in that game is next to zero. Especially for more than 2 weeks.
It's fairly strongly linked to strength in fit, trained people. It's also fairly strongly linked to strength in unfit, untrained people if comparing them to others of the same level of fitness and training.
Also, if you want a vaguely realistic melee system, it should take size and weight into account, especially if there's any close-in fighting and grappling. There's a reason boxing and other martial arts very commonly have weight categories, and there's a reason they are fairly narrow bands of weight.
Not all games have attributes that change after chargen (in fact it being the norm is a relatively recent thing), and if they are fairly static having size be one is fine (as in the BRP games) if it merits that degree of emphasis in your system. The fact that it's not easy to change (other than adding or losing body fat and to a certain degree muscle) suggests it's very much an innate characteristic of a character.
Just like a lot of people say they want "complete realism", but have obviously never stepped a foot into the real world.Modeling things in the abstract, IMO, tends toward what I would call simulation. In my experience that's almost always a terrible idea. Very few people actually want complete simulation in their RPGs even when they say they do.
Yeah, just tell 'em "roll 2d6 for months of healing" and see them balk.Just like a lot of people say they want "complete realism", but have obviously never stepped a foot into the real world.
One of those dice is a 1 - due to infection amputation is going to be necessary.Yeah, just tell 'em "roll 2d6 for months of healing" and see them balk.
And save vs pure luck or else tack a -1 strength on that arm the character broke, plus a 1/20 chance that stressing it causes you to drop stuff/release your grip.One of those dice is a 1 - due to infection amputation is going to be necessary.
But you now get a bonus to predict changes in the weather!And save vs pure luck or else tack a -1 strength on that arm the character broke, plus a 1/20 chance that stressing it causes you to drop stuff/release your grip.
I once hurt my right shoulder, no joke, while sat quietly on my couch painting my nails; fairly soon afterwards, I hurt my left shoulder grabbing onto a wall to prevent myself from falling down a flight of stairs. Two years later, my left shoulder is fine, but my right one is still only about 75%.And save vs pure luck or else tack a -1 strength on that arm the character broke, plus a 1/20 chance that stressing it causes you to drop stuff/release your grip.