Correct on both, though the latter is the Core rulebook (Corrected Version) for 1st ed. Babylon on Which Fame and Jubilation are Bestowed. I actually realized that the text included the game's initials, but it is such a niche product that I didn't think this was a bad thing.
Battlestar Galactica
Sloth_in_a_bowl dispatched my latest offerings so quickly, here is another. No art, but there's not much in the book anyway:
Correct
Is it Warriors of Darkmire?
Presumably a version of the Dreamlands supplement for Call of Cthulhu?
Correct
Dusk City Outlaws?
Yes!
Roma ImperiousSince
View attachment 48023
Warriors of Darkmyre, yes. I didn't think anyone would get that. Nice.
AZH is "in the Traveller universe".
That is clever reasoning and, in a sense, sort of on the right track, but it's not a World of Warcraft RPG.
That was my thought too, but I wasn't sure there was a Battlestar Galactica RPG.
Aye. Was a memorable page. No idea on yours, not a system I'm familiar with and the art doesn't ring a bell.
Cyberpunk 2013.
Albedo
Cadillacs and Dinosaurs, by GDW.
Now get a game like D&D 3.x, etc., or something like Mythras and do a flow chart at the same level of detail. Even ignoring options feats give in D&D it'll be as 'bad' or worse.Jesus Christ on a pogo stick. Check please...
It's not the complexity of the rules, it's the overwhelming visual.
That's only one page of it.It's not the complexity of the rules, it's the overwhelming visual.
Hence my reply...
Oh, I realise. It's a very common reaction from people not used to flow charts from back when they were used to display complex processes. However, the grumpy pedant in me is compelled to point out that tons of games are at least as 'complex' when laid out like that.It's not the complexity of the rules, it's the overwhelming visual.
I'm guessing Thirsty Sword Lesbians.
Is that Fire, Fusion, & Steel?
